closenno wrote:vodakmarketing wrote:Paul is in the APS business for over one year.
Closenno, just now you found to criticize ? Now? ... when he proved that can earn good money in this business? Closenno I think that speaks envy of you. I hope you do not mind but it is not right from you. Why do not you criticized earlier?
I can say that one of things or people, why I not quit from this business is PAUL CHERRY. Not Closenno or another super affiliate. His success has made me not give up.
And I can not say I got help from him, just a very little.
Anyway, if he show how effectively earn ... where is the problem?
Sorry for my language.
Where is the problem?!? ROFL!
Am I living in some kind of parallel universe here? I can't believe we're even having this conversation. Some of the remarks in this thread have me floored.
Let me break this down for those who are struggling to grasp this simple concept: You can't misrepresent offers!
This means you can't guarantee prospects a $6,000 a month income if you are promoting the APS business opportunity. Just as you can't advertise properties for the same price as a Burger King double cheeseburger if you are promoting the APL real estate offers!
And when a few members do this they potentially put all of us at risk for the possibility of:
1) Pulled offers
2) Reduced payouts
3) More restrictions
4) Negative brand recognition
Not to mention the potential legal issues Tissa could face.
Unbelievable! 
-Chris
For me, and I think for many other members who do not live in USA, this problem, about using the word "guaranteed" seems trivial.
In Romania never had a problem like this ... I think neither India ... I'm right kausarkhan?
I find it strange ... I did't know that in USA, are restricted to something like that ... But if these are the rules we mast to follow .... So I apologize if I offended Closenno with my assessment.
But still bothered me that he now criticize ... Paul is happy to be able to reach its target of $ 1,000. I think what made Paul is very motivating for new members. Criticism is constructive indeed but now, I think, it was better in private.
I appreciate Closenno's contribution to the forum.
I hope he understood my reaction.
For Paul, congratulations and hope to share more of yours knowledge.
Constantin